anniversary of the 34-year old holocaust
Holocaust-- Any mass slaughter or reckless destruction of life
January 22, 1973--The Supreme Court federalized a "constitutional right" to abortion in the case Roe v. Wade. What was the result?
1. More than 45 million unborn babies have been murdered since 1973. Over 13 million of those babies were black babies.
2. Minority women constitute only 13% of the female population (ages 15-44) in the U.S., but they underwent about 36% of the abortions.
3. More than 1400 Black babies are aborted in the U.S. every day.
4. The Black population of the United States would be 35% higher today if it weren't for abortion.
5. Abortion is no different from any other kind of genocide that has occured throughout history. Look at http://blackgenocide.org/abortion.html.
6. Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in America, was founded by Margaret Sanger, a notorious devotee of eugenics. Look at http://blackgenocide.org/planned.html to learn more about Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, and their racist beliefs that have led directly to the mass murder of so many innocent black babies.
7. The number of abortions performed in America has been steadily dropping each year for the last 5 or 6 years. This has caused Planned Parenthood to begin marketing abortion more aggressively so as to encourage that number to go up. The most outrageous example of their marketing has been the printing of T-shirts promoting abortion. How sick is that?
Happy birthday, Roe v. Wade! You have had quite a life!
January 22, 1973--The Supreme Court federalized a "constitutional right" to abortion in the case Roe v. Wade. What was the result?
1. More than 45 million unborn babies have been murdered since 1973. Over 13 million of those babies were black babies.
2. Minority women constitute only 13% of the female population (ages 15-44) in the U.S., but they underwent about 36% of the abortions.
3. More than 1400 Black babies are aborted in the U.S. every day.
4. The Black population of the United States would be 35% higher today if it weren't for abortion.
5. Abortion is no different from any other kind of genocide that has occured throughout history. Look at http://blackgenocide.org/abortion.html.
6. Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in America, was founded by Margaret Sanger, a notorious devotee of eugenics. Look at http://blackgenocide.org/planned.html to learn more about Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, and their racist beliefs that have led directly to the mass murder of so many innocent black babies.
7. The number of abortions performed in America has been steadily dropping each year for the last 5 or 6 years. This has caused Planned Parenthood to begin marketing abortion more aggressively so as to encourage that number to go up. The most outrageous example of their marketing has been the printing of T-shirts promoting abortion. How sick is that?
Happy birthday, Roe v. Wade! You have had quite a life!
posted by hondo at 11:04 AM
2 Comments:
Hondo,
Your points truly reveal a tragedy in American culture and the T-shirt sale by Planned Parenthood really is disapointingly "sick."
By the definition you used of Holocaust, "Any mass slaughter or reckless destruction of life," do you think the indiscrimnate force that we Americans are using in Iraq and Afghanistan qualify?
One of your blog entries emotionally charged the concept of withdrawl of forces as "cut and run" and "gutless and cowardly." I disagree. Besides the fact the we should never have fought the Iraq war this time (America simply does not posees the morale compass for this type of war in these circumstances) Iraq's circumstances have changed. We should not be fighting someone else's civil war.
And your republican Chuck Hagel is making the case right now better than any deomcrat's are.
I will leave you with a letter published in the Stars & Stripes newspaper this morning from a democrat named Chuck Reed in La.
Kindest regards,
Hondo-Watch
When Stars and Stripes came up on my Google News [Web] page (with the story of President Bush’s surge plan) it took me back, back to the last time I read Stars and Stripes: 1970 in the central highlands of Vietnam.
As a Democrat who opposed the war in Iraq, I want to assure every boot in the sandbox we, of similar opinion, have the deepest respect for soldiers and for units whose colors they carry. Opinions are opinions, but blood is blood.
As a 57-year-old retired deputy sheriff, I can assure servicemembers that they will never know a closer brotherhood than the one forged by fire. Never.
So, servicemembers should read the news, form their own opinions, but be reinforced by the truth: “Duty is the sublimest word in the language. You can never do more than your duty. You should never wish to do less.” — Robert E. Lee
Thank you for your service. See y’all back in “the World.”
To your first question--my answer is no. We didn't use indiscriminate force in Iraq or in Afghanistan. In fact, America has never, in our entire history, fought wars where we have taken greater pains to fight with limited force. Your question reveals, I believe, a tragic disconnect from reality that is fundamental to the liberal thought process. As soon as the first boots hit the ground in Afghanistan and Iraq, liberals were screaming about "indiscriminate force." You should go online and read some of the commentary from Newt Gingrich on this point. I know that you probably hate Gingrich, but you would benefit from reading his thoughts on the subject. Gingrich has been loudly critical of the way in which Bush has fought this war. He believes that Bush's many blunders have cost us lives, millions of dollars, and possibly any chance at victory. In other words, he is no blind supporter of Bush. He is also an historian, and he continually marvels at how careful our military forces have been in protecting civilians as we have gone after the terrorists. Our entire military strategy has been to hold back our awesome strength in order to protect the countries we are fighting in.
You are correct that circumstances have changed in Iraq, but it's not a civil war. Insurgents from Iran and Syria are now doing most of the fighting, and it is crucial that we defeat them. At the time that we invaded Iraq, the entire world believed that they had WMD. That includes Bill Clinton and Al Gore. If you are one of those people who still believes that Bush "cooked" the intelligence, I can't help you--your fantasy beliefs are too strong. If we had not invaded and it turned out that everyone was right, we would have had another 9/11, and Democrats would have been screaming for impeachment. Al Gore and Bill Clinton both supported invading Iraq, if you will recall.
Here is my basic complaint about the liberal view of this war: It wouldn't make any difference what Bush's strategy had been. Liberals are opposed to whatever Bush is for. If Bush had not invaded Iraq, liberals today would be screaming that he wasn't tough enough. If Bush had pulled out after removing Saddam, liberals would be screaming about the holocaust that would have ensued. As it was, Bush decided to stay the course, so liberals scream about that. This is an undeniable truth--whenever Bush says yes, liberals say no. This is why I have nothing but contempt for liberalism. It is dishonest, and it is actively trying to defeat us in the war on terror.
Post a Comment
<< Home