whatever happened to self reliance?
miamiherald.com/living/columnists/leonard_pitts/story/
206731.html
This is a very interesting column from Leonard Pitts of The Miami Herald. Pitts writes of a man living in Southern California who has publicly talked about his sexual attraction to little girls. He doesn't try to hide it, either. He has never been arrested on child molestation charges and, as far as anyone knows has never touched a little girl, but he is attracted to them. The man has posted photographs online of little girls--photos that he has taken. He has posted "how-to" instructions for child molesters as to where are the best places to find children. He hangs out in the children's section of the library so that he can be around little girls.
Of course this is sickening, but the law "can't" (won't) do anything. He has broken no specific statutes so he is free to act as he wishes.
Mr. Pitts expresses the notion that this is how it's supposed to be in a "civilized" republic. We are a nation of laws, and this pedophile hasn't broken any, so we are obligated to just ignore him.
Uh....no we aren't.
Why is it that we have devolved so far as a people that we think that self defense/personal protection is solely the responsibility of the government? That was never the thinking of clear-thinking Americans before--at least, for the first 180 years or so of our existence as a nation.
I'll spell it out. YOU are responsible for self defense/personal protection. YOU are responsible for making the streets of your city/town safe. Don't sit around like some sort of invalid waiting for Mommy and Daddy Government to come to your rescue.
The good people of Santa Clarita need to buck up and get this situation under control. Citizen watch groups should be organized to keep this freak under surveillance 24/7. They should be armed with camcorders and cell phones so that they can record his every move and so the police can be called in case of emergency. They need to keep detailed notes as to his daily activities so that, in case he commits a crime, the notes can be used against him in a court of law. Posters showing his picture should be placed everywhere in town so that people recognize him on sight. The posters should be placed outside his place of employment, as well. His co-workers need to know just who they work with.
Notice that I am not advocating vigilante justice. I am not calling for a mob to drag the guy into the streets to be hanged from the highest tree. He shouldn't be touched or harmed in any way. But he absolutely should be the focus of INTENSE scrutiny, and he should never be in the presence of a child without a group of citizens being right there with him.
That's the American way. Why are we so afraid to protect that which is so precious to us?
206731.html
This is a very interesting column from Leonard Pitts of The Miami Herald. Pitts writes of a man living in Southern California who has publicly talked about his sexual attraction to little girls. He doesn't try to hide it, either. He has never been arrested on child molestation charges and, as far as anyone knows has never touched a little girl, but he is attracted to them. The man has posted photographs online of little girls--photos that he has taken. He has posted "how-to" instructions for child molesters as to where are the best places to find children. He hangs out in the children's section of the library so that he can be around little girls.
Of course this is sickening, but the law "can't" (won't) do anything. He has broken no specific statutes so he is free to act as he wishes.
Mr. Pitts expresses the notion that this is how it's supposed to be in a "civilized" republic. We are a nation of laws, and this pedophile hasn't broken any, so we are obligated to just ignore him.
Uh....no we aren't.
Why is it that we have devolved so far as a people that we think that self defense/personal protection is solely the responsibility of the government? That was never the thinking of clear-thinking Americans before--at least, for the first 180 years or so of our existence as a nation.
I'll spell it out. YOU are responsible for self defense/personal protection. YOU are responsible for making the streets of your city/town safe. Don't sit around like some sort of invalid waiting for Mommy and Daddy Government to come to your rescue.
The good people of Santa Clarita need to buck up and get this situation under control. Citizen watch groups should be organized to keep this freak under surveillance 24/7. They should be armed with camcorders and cell phones so that they can record his every move and so the police can be called in case of emergency. They need to keep detailed notes as to his daily activities so that, in case he commits a crime, the notes can be used against him in a court of law. Posters showing his picture should be placed everywhere in town so that people recognize him on sight. The posters should be placed outside his place of employment, as well. His co-workers need to know just who they work with.
Notice that I am not advocating vigilante justice. I am not calling for a mob to drag the guy into the streets to be hanged from the highest tree. He shouldn't be touched or harmed in any way. But he absolutely should be the focus of INTENSE scrutiny, and he should never be in the presence of a child without a group of citizens being right there with him.
That's the American way. Why are we so afraid to protect that which is so precious to us?
posted by hondo at 3:09 PM
2 Comments:
A Critique of Leonard Pitts’ Latest LIES
Curt Maynard
Leonard Pitts’ is doing his best to deceive you! He thinks he can count on the power and influence of the mainstream media apparatus to bury what he really wrote about the Channon Christian, Chris Newsom murders that happened in Knoxville TN last January and the ever growing number of White Americans that are becoming increasingly angry over the mounting number of black on white crimes being committed in the United States today.
For a Pulitzer Prize winner Leonard Pitts isn’t very intelligent, nor is he the gifted wordsmith his supporters would like you and me to believe he is, just look at his article, it looks as if it were put together by an eighth grader.
Pitts’ is a dunce and he’s given himself away this time, in fact he’s made it entirely too easy. I’m going to show you the reader EXACTLY what Leonard Pitts’ wrote and then I’m going to show you EXACTLY how he’s trying to bury what he said and meant.
Today, June 27, 2007, the Miami Herald published this article by Leonard Pitts entitled “Neo-Nutsies bring frustration, anger and – and joy.[1]” In the article Pitts’ does his absolute best to draw the reader’s attention to the fact that some neo-nazis have taken him to task for an article he wrote a few weeks ago entitled “Oppressed Whites, Give Me a Break.[2]”
In the latter article Pitts clearly called whites [NOT just neo-nazis] that are concerned about the growing numbers of black on white crimes whiners and likely racists when he wrote “But still, one occasionally hears mewling [means whining] noises from that subset of my white countrymen who feel put upon by big, bad racial minorities. This is one of those times. And Knoxville, Tenn., has become the capital city of that lunatic fringe [In other words if you’re concerned you’re a lunatic and likely a racist too].
In the same article Pitts clearly tells all whites, not just racist whites that he couldn’t give a damn about their concerns when he wrote “I have four words for them [the racist whites] and any other white Americans who feel themselves similarly victimized… Cry me a river.”
Please note that our Puliutzer Prize winnner added the inclusive “AND any other other whites who feel themselves similarly victimized,” which, if you’re white, means you and me baby. Pitts’ doesn’t care, in fact he’d only cry us a river, which is just another way of saying screw you whitey.
So anyway, on to Pitts’ latest attempt to deceive the American public. Today, June 27, 2007, our Pulitzer Prize winner wrote in the aforementioned highly deceptive piece about the Neo-Nutsies, that he’d been harrassed and threatened by a “self-professed neo-Nazi leader whose name you won't read here.” [Meaning that Pitts isn't going to let YOU know who it was]. I suggest that the real reason Pitts won’t print his name, which is Bill White by the way, is because Pitts’ doesn’t want YOU the reader to get a gander at what he actually wrote in the initial column that irked White so much in the first place.
Pitts doesn’t want you the reader to do a google search on his name and Channon Christian’s name and see that there are thousands of articles and chatroom discussions denouncing HIM for HIS blatant racism, which is insurmountably worse than what he’s allegedly been subjected to by Bill White, because Bill White isn’t a syndicated columnist who words and ideas are read in newspapers from coast to coast.
Pitts doesn’t want you the reader to know that he doesn’t believe the Channon Christian, Chris Newsom murders were motivated by hate, despite the fact that four blacks including a black female kidnapped, tortured, gang raped, sodomized, and mutilated two young whites back in January of this year in Knoxville TN. Nonetheless that’s exactly what he wrote and to make matters worse he now matter a factly states that anyone believing otherwise, or anyone that doesn’t see the crime in exactly the same way he does is engaging in “an argument made for ridiculing.”[3]
Pitts’ biggest lie and one easy to prove to anyone willing to take a minute to examine his words is as follows. Pitts states in his latest article Neo-Nutsies bring frustration, anger and – and joy that one of the more ‘asinine’ of White’s contentions was that he [Pitts] “told those mourning the murders to "cry me a river.'' Pitts then insists that this is innacurate by then stating “I gave that advice specifically to white supremacists yelling genocide and other stupid things,” which is a complete and total LIE based on the mans own words which were once again very inclusive “I have four words for them [the racist whites] and any other white Americans who feel themselves similarly victimized… Cry me a river.”
That’s it, there it is, right before your very eyes. Unlike Pitts’ I’ll provide the reader with names and links to articles, I’m not afraid of the facts because I’m not afraid of the truth, but I assure you that Leonard Pitts is. Pitts is very concerned that he’ll lose his job at the Miami Herald and his syndicated column and he should be, because once his words hit the mainstream he’s finished. That is why I encourage anyone and everyone reading this article to send it to your local newspaper with the caveat that if they [your local paper] ever carry a Leonard Pitts article again you’ll drop your subscription. Send Leonard Pitts and his bosses at the Miami Herald an email calling for his dismissal. That’s just what four hundred people did immediately after Pitts first wrote the article Oppressed Whites, Give Me a Break only to be referred to as racists for their efforts.
Ask yourself is the truth racist? Can the truth ever be racist? According to Pitts and people like him it is. Pitts ends his latest article with this:
“I feel a little like Jimmy Stewart in It's a Wonderful Life. They say you can tell who a man is by looking at his friends. Which is true. But I believe you can also tell by looking at his enemies. Apparently, I have managed to make enemies of haters, bigots and other low, pathetic men… I must be doing something right.”
The above is further confirmation of the fact that Pitts’ isn’t in the least bit sorry for what he wrote and in fact equates any dissenting views as those coming alone from “haters, bigots and other low, pathetic men.” So, if you were in the least bit offended by what Pitts’ wrote chalk yourself up as a hater too. Your opinion as far as his piece is of no importance whatsoever, because you’re a bigot.
In conclusion I’d like to highlight another monstrous lie that Pitts’ attempts to foist upon his readers and that is, in his own words, that black on white crime is “a relative statistical rarity.”[4]
People, a Pulitzer Prize winner should be a whole lot more careful, or at least a whole lot more cunning, when attempting to force a lie that large down the readers throat. I can’t imagine that more than 1 in 10 of his readers actually believes what he wrote, it’s preposterous and what’s more, it’s easily proven false. FBI and Department of Justice statistics prove beyong a shadow of a doubt that black males between the ages of 12 and 60 commit MORE than 50% of the murders in the United States of America[5] and you can bet they are not just killing black people.
There are websites devoted to tracking black on white crime, websites like newnation news[6] as just one example and although perhaps politically incorrect to the extreme they only document factual cases of black on white crimes documented with primary sources. If you visit that website you’ll quickly see cases of black on white crime that are too horrific to even imagine, but more importantly what you’ll quickly realize is that the vast majority of these cases you’ve never heard of and that is because the mainstream media has a vested interest, as does Leonard Pitts, in keeping you in the dark, because if you were to find out exactly to what extent black on white crime has become commonplace in America today you might get angry and we couldn’t have that in our multicultural paradise now could we?
In any case, I have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in this article that Leonard Pitts is a liar. I hope you’ll take a few moments to comment on this article here and to contact Pitts and the Miami Herald in order to voice your outrage. If you’re not outraged, I feel sorry for you, because you have not only sold yourself down the river, you’ve sold your family and friends down that river too, a river created by the same tears of indifference that Pitts has for you and “any other whites” that feel the same.
Leonard Pitts lpitts@MiamiHerald.com
Miami Herald DWilson@miamiherald.com [Dave Wilson is Leonard Pitts' boss]
Here is a link to a petition calling for the firing of Leonard Pitts HERE
[1] http://www.miamiherald.com/418/story/152502.html
[2] http://www.miamiherald.com/285/story/125806.html
[3] http://www.miamiherald.com/418/story/152502.html
[4] http://www.miamiherald.com/418/story/152502.html
[5] http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm
[6] http://newnation.org/NNN-Black-on-White.html
Yes, sports fans, we have kooks on our side of the political aisle too! Raging insanity is not confined just to the left, sad to say. That comment started out with the words "A Critique of Leonard Pitts' Latest Lies" and then veered into a rant about past columns. What is it about nuts (on both the left and the right) that prevent them from staying on topic?
I'll comment more later on this rant from anonymous, but I'm out of time right now. Take your medication, anonymous!
Post a Comment
<< Home